If history appears to move forward, it is only because the carousel turns. What we often call progress is, in truth, a patterned exchange of roles—oppressor becomes oppressed, colonizer becomes colonized, victim becomes enforcer. The players change; the game remains. At its core, the enduring logic of domination is not about who holds power, but about what power is and why it demands to be held at all.
Structured power is not merely an external force—it is an invisible scaffolding that shapes perception, agency, value, and control. It organizes society, but more than that, it organizes the mind. We are not outside of power; we are composed by it. Institutions, language, capital, race, and law are not just instruments of control; they are ontological technologies—means of producing what we take to be real, valuable, and possible.
Race, nation, and ideology are not origins of conflict but modalities through which structured power expresses itself. They are mutable symbols re-coded to preserve existing hierarchies under different names. Power does not care which face it wears; its survival depends on continuity beneath rupture.
Michel Foucault’s insight—that power is everywhere because it comes from everywhere—reveals that power is not something to be seized, but a field one is embedded in. It is diffused, systemic, and generative. What we call “order” is in fact an epistemic inheritance: a pre-existing lattice of assumptions, norms, and roles that shape the subject even before they act.
When new groups “gain power,” they rarely abolish this structure; instead, they inhabit its architecture. Why? Because the architecture seduces. It promises coherence, stability, authority—what Hannah Arendt called the “banality” of administrative power. This is why post-colonial leaders often reproduce colonial behaviors: they inherit bureaucracies, juridical systems, and logics of control too deeply rooted to unmake without chaos.
Power persists because its structure is masked as necessity.
Every system of control must clothe itself in meaning. Power requires myth. It must explain itself, sanctify itself, and moralize its own existence. Whether through the language of racial superiority, divine right, historical destiny, victimhood, or liberation, power creates a moral script to justify domination. This is not just propaganda—it is performative metaphysics.
These legitimizing narratives are ritually embedded in schools, media, religion, and art. They reproduce the system not only externally but within the subject. We learn who the enemy is, what to fear, who to follow, and what to value. Even revolutions often retain the structure of the enemy they overthrew, merely inverting the storyline.
Anti-colonial struggles become authoritarian. Socialist revolutions birth bureaucratic elites. The rhetoric changes, but the logic persists: there must be an Other, a mandate, a sacred mission to maintain cohesion and control.
Perhaps the most insidious dimension of power is its ability to reproduce itself within us. Frantz Fanon, in Black Skin, White Masks, laid bare how colonial subjects internalize the gaze of the colonizer, shaping their self-worth, speech, aesthetics, and desires around the image of their subjugator.
This is the colonization of consciousness. Once power is internalized, it no longer needs to coerce. Subjects regulate themselves—pursuing status, conformity, and security along lines dictated by invisible codes. This is how social class, beauty standards, gender norms, and national identity become stable: not through enforcement, but through seduction and habituation.
People begin to desire the very forms that limit them. Power wins not through violence, but through desire.
Even sincere revolutions often collapse into replicas of the regimes they oppose. Why? Because the gravitational field of structured power is strong. It reshapes not only institutions, but imagination. The revolutionary begins with hope but ends up rebuilding the same walls with different slogans. The system rewards control, punishes empathy, and creates conditions where survival means complicity.
The failure is not moral—it is architectural. The system is designed to reproduce itself through any inhabitant, like a virus using a new host. To “seize power” often means to be seized by it.
The concept of race, far from being a primordial truth, was engineered to serve structured power. During the 16th to 19th centuries, as colonial empires expanded, race became a tool of economic rationalization and moral anesthesia. It justified slavery, genocide, land seizure, and the exploitation of labor.
The Enlightenment’s racial typologies cloaked domination in reason. The U.S. Constitution enshrined it; European law codified it; science “measured” it. Race became an operating system for organizing humans into hierarchies—legal, economic, spiritual. This invention became a reality through repetition, violence, and internalization.
Conflict around race is not proof of essential difference—it is evidence of how deeply structured power can embed fabricated divisions into material and psychological reality.
True transformation begins not by asking who holds power, but by interrogating why we build systems that require domination at all. Why must power be hoarded, defended, and ritualized? Why must it generate enemies to sustain itself? Why does agency in our societies so often mean control over others, rather than deepened mutuality?
Power’s true genius is its ability to disguise itself as nature, order, or morality. But power is none of these things. It is a design—reproducible, reversible, and, crucially, dismantlable.
The Mirror and the Maze: Consciousness as Witness to Structured Power
If structured power is the invisible scaffolding of society—shaping thought, desire, and agency—then consciousness is the silent witness walking its corridors. Most of the time, we don’t see the structure. We live it. We speak its grammar, perform its values, enforce its laws upon ourselves. But sometimes—rarely—consciousness catches a glimpse of the machine. In that moment, we don’t just see the world differently; we see how the world has been seen for us.
This is not a metaphysical awakening. It is not a mystical break with reality. It is the moment when the subject becomes aware of the architecture that built the subject. To see structured power is not simply to notice inequality—it is to recognize that perception itself has been trained by power’s designs. Consciousness becomes a witness to its own construction.
Structured power does not merely repress; it produces. It produces norms, categories, values, and selves. From birth, we are drafted into roles—gendered, racialized, classed, nationalized. We inherit myths about success, justice, beauty, and order. These are not neutral stories; they are scripts that discipline the body and the will. We believe we are choosing, but often we are choosing within preconfigured constraints.
Frantz Fanon understood this intimately. His concept of “epidermalization” in Black Skin, White Masks describes how the Black subject internalizes the colonial gaze, seeing themselves as an object in the eyes of the other. But Fanon’s insight can be generalized: all power, once internalized, becomes self-maintaining. The colonizer’s voice becomes the conscience. The institution becomes the inner law. You perform the system even when no one is watching.
Consciousness, when structured, becomes a maze. The exit is obscured not by walls but by mirrors.
Yet consciousness can also become a site of rupture. A disturbance. A refusal. There are moments when the internal monologue no longer sounds like one’s own. When the inherited myths crack under their own weight. When the “natural” order feels fabricated. In these moments, consciousness turns from participant to observer. This is not disobedience; it is dis-identification.
To dis-identify is to say: this script is not mine. These roles are not essential. This fear, this ambition, this resentment—they are not native, they are installed.
But dis-identification is not liberation. Seeing the structure is not the same as leaving it. One can awaken in a cage and still be caged. The deeper task is not only to see power, but to stop performing it.
When consciousness sees the structure clearly, the mirror of power begins to fracture. What breaks is not reality—it is its choreography. The timing of speech, the posture of deference, the desire for status, the hatred of the other, the worship of control—these begin to look absurd. Like rituals one no longer believes in.
Power loses its spell when its stagecraft becomes visible.
Yet this moment is dangerous. To step outside the choreography is to become illegible. Power punishes what it cannot categorize. Dissidents are not just attacked—they are dismissed, pathologized, or erased. The structure defends itself by rendering the awakened mind incoherent.
But incoherence is often the beginning of freedom.
As The Carousel of Power argued, changing who holds power does nothing if the structure itself is untouched. Revolutions that seize the reins often replicate the path of those they unseated. Why? Because they remain inside the same maze—just walking in the other direction.
Consciousness that sees the structure is not content with reversal. It asks deeper questions: Why do we need reins at all? What kind of world requires hierarchy, discipline, domination? What form of self requires control over another to feel real?
These are ontological questions—not about politics alone, but about being.
To witness power is to reclaim the capacity to choose. Not just between options, but between logics. Between architectures of control and architectures of care. Between scarcity and mutuality. Between obedience and aliveness.
This is the work of unbuilding. Not utopian escapism, but the slow, deliberate refusal to reproduce what one has inherited. It begins in the psyche but must move into systems, rituals, economies, and relations.
Consciousness becomes not just a witness—but a conductor of new patterns.
Conclusion: The Witness Becomes the Architect
Structured power survives by making itself invisible. It persists by embedding itself in the psyche, in habits, in dreams. But consciousness, when it sees, begins to dissolve its hold—not through revolution, but through revelation.
To see is to interrupt. To dis-identify is to reconfigure. The mirror cracks. The maze loses its force. And in that space, something unthinkable emerges:
Not the seizure of power, but the end of its necessity.
Add comment
Comments